I went to Charlottesville during the protests, and here’s what I saw

By Jarrett Stepman | The Daily Signal

I picked quite a time to go on a weekend trip to Charlottesville.

What was supposed to be a nice getaway with my wife turned into a journey through the eye of a national media storm.

On Saturday, clashes between “Unite the Right” protestors and “anti-fascist” counterprotesters at the foot of a Gen. Robert E. Lee statue — which the City Council had voted to remove from a local park — turned violent.

One woman was killed when an Ohio man allegedly associated with the white nationalist marchers rammed his car through a wave of people. He has been charged with second-degree murder.

The clash between neo-Nazis and leftists in the streets was an ugly and surreal scene one would associate with 1930s Germany, not a sleepy American town in the heart of central Virginia.

A City, and Country, in Shock

The attitude of people around Charlottesville — the silent majority — deserves to be noted. They were almost universally upset, blindsided, and resentful that these groups showed up in their community to drag down its reputation and fight their ideological proxy wars.

Albemarle County, which includes Charlottesville and a few other small towns, is deeply blue in its most populated centers around the University of Virginia and dark red on the outskirts. It’s politically purple. Yet everywhere I went, the attitude toward the protests was similar.

As a thunderstorm rolled in on Saturday evening, a waitress at a restaurant I ate at said, “Let’s hope this washes the day away.”

A local gas station attendant told my wife: “These people from out of town, Nazis, [Black Lives Matter], they’re all hate groups to me.”

In the aftermath of the events, most townsfolk walking in the Charlottesville downtown area appeared stunned and shaken. The overall feeling in the area was resentment — certainly not sympathy for any of the groups involved.

It would be a mistake to blow the events in Charlottesville too far out of proportion by linking either side to a mainstream political movement. In the grand scheme of things, it was a small-scale clash between groups who clearly represent an extreme minority in this country.

Even calling the gathering of a couple hundred people a “movement” would be a stretch. The overwhelming media attention given to these fascist, racist groups even before violence took place served as a conduit for the views of this handful of people.

The media’s role in blowing this event out of proportion is lamentable and predictable, but it doesn’t excuse what took place.

What the event does demonstrate is the looming danger of identity politics run amok. This is what is in store if we are consumed by the tribal politics that have destroyed so many other countries.

In June, I wrote about why I think politically incorrect historical monuments — even Confederate ones like the Lee statue in Charlottesville — should stay.

At the time I wrote:

In our iconoclastic efforts to erase the past, we rob ourselves of knowing the men who forged our national identity, and the events that made us who we are. This nation, of almost incomprehensible wealth, power, and prosperity, was created by the decisions of men like Lincoln—and Lee, too.

The zealous march to obliterate America’s past, even parts we dislike, will leave us a diminished civilization.

Though many have now jumped to conclude that the events in Charlottesville show the need to give in to the desire of people to tear down statues, this will only serve to strengthen and embolden the radicals — on both sides — to step up their efforts to plunge the nation into constant social unrest and civil war.

Identity Over Individuals

In a sense, the “alt-right” and leftist agitators want the same thing. They both seek to redefine the battle over American history in racial and tribal terms in direct opposition to the most basic ideas of our national existence.

Such was the case in the unsightly scene in front of Charlottesville’s Lee statue.

The real individuals whom these statues represent simply ceased to matter.

It was telling that a counterprotest erupted in Washington, D.C., in front of the Albert Pike memorial. Pike had been a Confederate general, but the memorial itself was simply dedicated to his work as a freemason and not his military career.

That fact was irrelevant.

Only the war over identity mattered. Pike must be plucked out and purged.

In a country of 320 million people of stunningly diverse ethnic backgrounds and philosophies, this is a fire bell in the night for complete cultural disintegration. The end result will be uglier than the already sickening events that took place this weekend.

The Federalist’s publisher, Ben Domenech, rightly noted what this means for the direction of the country: “[I]t is the open conflict of a nation at war with itself over its own character. This war will end badly, no matter how it plays out. And the way this story ends is in demolishing [Thomas Jefferson’s] Monticello brick by brick.”

There is no arc of history bending perpetually on its own toward justice. History is instead a series of twists and turns, influenced by cultural and social forces as well as individuals and communities.

America has never been a perfect nation. It has benefitted from great ideas advanced by imperfect men, and almost miraculously formed a great and good national community out of widely disparate elements.

This history is worth remembering and even celebrating. It shouldn’t be buried because a few evil men have twisted it to serve their causes. Nor should it be used to attack and haunt the living.

As the late 19th-century poet Henry Van Dyke wrote:

I know that Europe’s wonderful, yet something seems to lack:
The Past is too much with her, and the people looking back.
But the glory of the present is to make our future free —
We love our land for what she is and what she is to be.

This is the spirit of our country, and it won’t change because a few thugs wish to turn our most fundamental principles on their head. We have a duty to repudiate them through a stronger dedication to the founding principles that have made this country great.

7 thoughts on “I went to Charlottesville during the protests, and here’s what I saw

  1. It was at considerable cost in blood and treasure that slavery was ended in this country. I think it also safe to say that most of the wealth created by the institution was eradicated in the process.

  2. The author gives a lot of credit for the wealth of this nation to its founding fathers, men like Washington and Jefferson. He quotes from a former article he wrote for True North:

    “In our iconoclastic efforts to erase the past, we rob ourselves of knowing the men who forged our national identity, and the events that made us who we are. This nation, of almost incomprehensible wealth, power, and prosperity, was created by the decisions of men like Lincoln—and Lee, too.”

    Steppman diregards the fact that it was the enslaved population which made American (and many of our founding fathers) wealthy and powerful. This nation was built on their backs.

    In his book “Battle Cry of Freedom” James McPherson noted “…by 1860, there were more millionaires (slaveholders all) living in the lower Mississippi Valley than anywhere else in the United States. In the same year, the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth some $3.5 billion, making them the largest single financial asset in the entire U.S. economy, worth more than all manufacturing and railroads combined. ” At the start of the Civil War 60% of the population of the State of South Carolina were slaves.

    Anyone interested in the economics of slavery and its contribution to America’s success should read Roger Ransom’s incredible paper “The Economics of the Civil War”. Here is a link: http://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economics-of-the-civil-war/.

    In closing, I’m not an iconoclast – never thought that revisionist history was worth much anyway. But how about we attack the problem by putting out some accurate information, and saluting the forgotten people who lived and died in slavery, to make this country great? For every monument to the Southern Civil War Soldier a town or city should be required to erect a similar monument to the enslaved peoples who actually built the civilization and economy the pre-Civil War South was able to enjoy. At the base of such monuments it could say “The Wealth Of The Nation Was Built On Their Blood. Thank You. We’re Sorry”

    • I think we said “We’re Sorry” when our ancestors blood was spilled on battlefields for their freedom. It’s time to quit looking back at what was and time to move on to the future. There is no other country in the world where blacks (or anybody) have the opportunity to succeed and thrive than the United States of America. What is going on between the left and right is like keeping our country in “Groundhog Day”.

  3. Well said… now we need our politicians speaking in the same terms. We can not allow our History to be erased. Our politicians have got to stop dividing us and bring us together.

  4. We need look no further than China’s Cultural Revolution to see the outcome of a society that erases its past. This is what is happening to the United States today, as our monuments and statues are destroyed because somebody is ‘offended’. Where does it stop? Even the Lincoln Memorial was defaced with graffiti this weekend. Trump is right in condemning both extremists. Neo-Nazis, Antifa, Black Lives Matter….all full of hate. If anything needs to be destroyed, it is these groups.

    • PeteMo,
      Washington, Jefferson, and many other prominent people with statues all over the US were slave owners.

      It would be improper to take down their statues, because some extremist groups, left or right, are offended.

      It would be better for all of us to know the pro and cons of issues as they were seen at that time to better learn the history and culture of America.

      All issues have many sides. Mature people/leaders/media people should have a 360-degree view of them.

Comments are closed.