By Marie Fishpaw and Grace-Marie Turner | The Daily Signal
Congressional leaders were poised last month to spend tens of billions of dollars in the omnibus bill to temporarily shore up Obamacare’s failing health insurance system.
That money, however, never would have given Americans the long-term relief they so desperately need.
After this idea was struck from the spending bill, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., who had worked closely with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, to shape a bipartisan deal, said that “the only choice we have is to go back to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.”
We agree. Obamacare is broken and cannot be fixed, and there is a better way forward.
The true cost of Obamacare
Soaring costs and declining choices are driving hardworking Americans and small businesses out of health insurance coverage. More than 28 million Americans remain uninsured. Millions more struggle to afford their premiums and deductibles.
Obamacare has nearly destroyed the private market for individual health insurance. Young people find it increasingly difficult to find entry-level jobs because the employer mandate makes it so expensive for companies to hire them. Lower-income Americans find themselves stuck with Medicaid rather than having a choice of a better plan.
The No. 1 issue voters want their elected representatives to address this year is the high cost of health coverage.
Give Americans real relief
Americans need genuine relief that doesn’t just paper over Obamacare’s serious flaws, but instead opens a new path for real reform.
We, along with many colleagues and allies in the conservative community, are working to chart this new path based on the reform plan offered last year by Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Bill Cassidy, R-La.; Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; and Dean Heller, R-Nev.
Our plan targets the two main problems under Obamacare: Costs went up, and choices went down.
To fix these problems, we lay out three big goals to: 1) lower costs and improve patient choices, 2) give states flexibility and resources to achieve these goals, and 3) set federal guardrails so people can choose private coverage if they don’t like the options their state provides.
Our plan recognizes that what works in Massachusetts will not work in Mississippi or Missouri or Montana. What works in big cities will not work in rural areas. In response, we would provide states with greater flexibility and new resources to serve as stewards in returning freedom and choice over health decisions to patients.
Dollars would flow not to insurance companies, but to the states through block grants that would replace Obamacare’s payments to insurers. With new flexibility, states could use the money to:
- Lower premiums and stabilize turbulent health insurance markets.
- Improve choices and encourage wider coverage for all by creating innovative coverage options.
- Allow recipients to use their government assistance to buy a private health plan of their choice.
- Protect the vulnerable by helping those with pre-existing conditions without making coverage so costly for the young and healthy.
Our plan would also support patient choice with improved health savings accounts. Taxpayers would be better protected because federal spending would be placed on a predictable path. And our plan has built-in life protections.
Building on progress
This plan builds on stepping stones laid out by Congress and President Donald Trump.
Congress has repealed Obamacare’s most despised provision—the individual mandate tax penalty—starting next year. It also delayed several of Obamacare’s most destructive taxes, and it repealed the dreaded Independent Payment Advisory Board.
The Trump administration is doing all it can with its regulatory authority to give people more affordable choices, including allowing small businesses and individually-insured people the ability to join larger insurance pools to get better rates and more flexible benefits. And it is reviving temporary health insurance policies, which will allow millions of Americans a bridge to retaining coverage.
This step-by-step relief is important, but it is not enough. These actions do not repair the fundamental damage that Obamacare is doing to the private insurance market. For that, Congress must act.
Obamacare broke its core promises by increasing costs and reducing choices. The federal government has taken over decisions that should be made by families. Patient choice and competition have been usurped by government control.
There is a brighter path forward. Our plan would serve as a down payment to reverse this damage. It would begin to restore a properly functioning market in the health sector to lower costs through consumer choice and competition—allowing Americans greater ability to choose the doctor, health care, and health plan of their choice.
We believe this path could get majority support in Congress and show the American people that members understand their distress. We are inspired by the willingness of so many to work creatively toward providing this down payment solution to begin addressing Obamacare’s problems.
A unique solution
As former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum observed, in his 25 years in public life, this is the first time he has seen a major initiative emerge from “the bottom up and the inside out” to refine a policy proposal and build broad coalition support.
Congressional Republicans are right to worry about Obamacare’s problems. They would be wise to consider this plan as the true solution to the problems facing America under Obamacare.
Doug Badger, Galen Institute and The Heritage Foundation
George Barna, American Culture & Faith Institute
Gary Bauer, American Values
Naomi Lopez Bauman, Goldwater Institute
Lanhee Chen, Hoover Institution and Stanford University
Dean Clancy, HSAs for All
Benita Dodd, Georgia Public Policy Foundation
Marie Fishpaw, The Heritage Foundation
Linda Gorman, Independence Institute
Beverly Gossage, HSA Benefits Consulting and Independent Women’s Forum
Kristan Hawkins, Students for Life
Rea Hederman Jr., The Buckeye Institute
Phil Kerpen, American Commitment
Heather R. Higgins, Independent Women’s Voice
Dan Holler, Heritage Action for America
Lindsay Boyd Killen, Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Yuval Levin, Ethics and Public Policy Center
Carrie Lukas, Independent Women’s Forum
Nadine Maenza, Patriot Voices
Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund
Derek Monson, Sutherland Institute
Peter Morrow, Catholic Medical Association
Mike Needham, Heritage Action for America
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
Sal Nuzzo, The James Madison Institute
Dan Perrin, HSA Coalition
Sally Pipes, Pacific Research Institute
Ramesh Ponnuru, American Enterprise Institute
Kevin Roberts, Texas Public Policy Foundation
Jameson Taylor, Mississippi Center for Public Policy
Mike Thompson, Thomas Jefferson Institute
Grace-Marie Turner, Galen Institute
Dan Weber, Association of Mature American Citizens