Corporate tax reform would mostly help workers, not the rich

By Adam Michel | The Daily Signal

Politicians who don’t want tax reform are busy making the case that cutting taxes for business will not help workers.

Those politicians are backed up by government scorekeepers who, unfortunately, have their economic analysis exactly backward.

Despite the name “corporate” tax reform, the burden of the corporate income tax falls almost entirely on workers in the form of lower wages. Americans are undoubtedly skeptical about this claim, but the realities on the ground are actually quite simple.

Businesses invest money in their workplace so that their employees can be more productive. Part of this involves paying higher wages to employees who become more productive and are in higher demand from other firms who are making similar investments.

American corporations pay a federal corporate income tax rate of 35 percent—one of the highest in the world. High corporate taxes discourage this kind of investment in American workplaces, thus killing the potential for workers to earn higher wages.

Most of the cost of corporate taxes—between 75 and 100 percent—is passed on to workers in the form of lower wages. This fact is shown in the results of 10 separate economic studies.

On the flip side of the coin, American households would share in the benefits of a corporate tax cut in receiving higher wages.

This is where government scorekeepers like the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office get it wrong.

In contradiction to the relevant economic literature, they maintain that only one quarter of the corporate tax is passed on to workers. The other 75 percent is assumed to go to owners of capital—the corporate owners.

This misguided view is posing an obstacle to tax reform, as government modeling assumptions have a bias toward viewing the wealthy as beneficiaries of corporate tax reform. They do not properly account for the benefits that will accrue to lower-income wage earners.

Contrary to what these government models would suggest, slashing the corporate tax rate would help the poor far more than the rich.

A 20-point reduction of the corporate income tax—from 35 percent to 15 percent—could boost the relative market incomes of the poorest Americans by 2.4 percent. That’s $365 for a household that earns $15,000 a year, and more than twice the 1.1 percent increase for the richest 1 percent.

And that’s not even accounting for the economic growth that would compound over time as a result of tax reform. When accounting for that growth, others have estimated that wages could increase by as much as 28 percent.

When Congress finally releases a detailed tax reform plan, the distributional analysis could make or break its political viability. If government scorekeepers continue to assume that owners of capital will benefit the most from tax reform, they will mislead the public.

It would be a shame if backward assumptions misinformed the public and obstructed this historic opportunity to update the U.S. tax code. The current corporate tax code is largely responsible for our anemic economic growth, the historically low rate of business start-ups, and reduced economic dynamism.

Across the U.S., corporations employ 55 million hardworking people who create products for global and domestic markets. A lower corporate income tax rate will benefit not only those 55 million Americans, but all Americans, as increased investment and job creation would put upward pressure on all wages.

Moreover, by attracting business and investment back to the U.S. with a more favorable tax environment, tax reform will renew America’s place as a top global destination to do business and hire workers.

That’s a change that all lawmakers who care about the well-being of American families should embrace.

2 thoughts on “Corporate tax reform would mostly help workers, not the rich

  1. “The other 75 percent is assumed to go to owners of capital—the corporate owners.”

    Who are the corporate owners?
    In a public corporation are they not the shareholders and bondholders?
    Many of these “owners” are then entitled to share in the profits of the said corporation. Since pensions including teachers, firemen, police, universities as well as mutual funds and individual investors own stock, then they too are sharing the profits via dividends. No profits no dividends, no capital improvements nor investments into research and development.
    These profits/dividends end up in the bank accounts and wallets of not only the employees but the thousands of other investors who depend on them. And lest we forget, dividends and profits are taxable to the state, local and federal government coffers; all swell from the benefits of PROFIT.

    • After the GOP’s latest on health care reform, I’d rather take my chances with government. At least I’ll eat…

Comments are closed.