A recent development in energy extraction technology has yielded both economic and environmental benefits despite being hampered by opposition from “environmental” groups. The fruits of a technology known as “fracking” was explored in an article on Yahoo Finance’s “The Daily Tracker”:
In a welcome development almost no one saw coming, America’s greenhouse gas emissions have fallen to 1992 levels and are expected to continue to decline, according to the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA).
In addition to a sluggish economy and more fuel efficient cars, “fracking” has been a big driver of this trend. “Fracking” is shorthand for hydraulic fracturing, the process of extracting natural gas from shale rock. The EIA projects U.S. greenhouse emissions will fall below 2005 levels by 2040.
“It is a revolution,” says Joel Kurtzman, a senior fellow at the Milken Institute. “We should be using it. We should be embracing it. It’s domestic. We spend $350 billion a year buying foreign oil. We can replace almost all of that with natural gas.”
Indeed, there are multiple benefits to increased natural gas production, including less dependence on foreign oil and opportunities for the U.S. to be an energy exporter. Lower energy costs are also helping to revive U.S. manufacturing, creating jobs in addition to those directly associated with fracking activity.
The boom in domestic natural gas production has really been the biggest macro economic development of 2012 — even if the election, the fiscal cliff and various other concerns have overshadowed it.
As an aside, Kurtzman notes the U.S. is now on track to meet the emission targets of the Kyoto Protocol, a treaty the U.S. did not sign, much to the chagrin of many greens.
“The reason why we’ve had these changes is not because of policy,” be it carbon taxes or the Kyoto treaty, Kurtzman says. “The treaty itself is not working from an environmental or policy perspective. What is working is the fact that low-priced natural gas is replacing coal; that has a dramatic effect, which is measurable” as electricity produced by natural gas emits 43% less carbon dioxide versus coal.
Despite the win-win scenario of economic and environmental benefits brought to us by the free market, this new innovation is opposed by environmental groups: “While Kurtzman and others see a victory for free market capitalism, fracking is highly controversial and has replaced greenhouse gases as the primary concern of environmentalists. Among other issues such as air pollution, opponents fear contamination of local water supplies from the chemicals used in the practice.” Such opposition is the primary obstacle standing in the way of taking full advantage of this new development. We have proven quantifiable economic AND environmental benefits vs. “fears” of safety related issues. Even though the acknowledged risks associated with the new technology have yet to manifest as actual safety incidents, and steps have been taking to minimize such risks, environmental groups still are doing everything in their power to put a stop to it. In fact, experts in the field see the risks as minimal if the process is done right: “Daniel Yergin, author of the New York Times bestseller The Quest, has studied the fracking process extensively with his team at IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates and concluded that the method is safe, “if it is done right.”