Independent candidates look to introduce new solutions in Vermont

The two-party system in America can be suspect for those looking to see new issues at the political forefront.

Yet Democrats and Republicans generally stick to their road map, and those who stray risk losing crucial party support. Nonetheless, several politically passionate Vermonters chose to run as independent or alternative party candidates.

Chuck Laramie

Charles Laramie, of Fair Haven, is running for governor as an independent.

“There is a movement beginning to sweep Vermont and the Nation. This movement has people realizing that the two-party system is broken and there are other alternatives; that Independents only answer to the voter and common sense,” Charles Laramie, an independent candidate for governor, wrote last month in a press release.

Laramie is a retired teacher from Fair Haven who feels the education system is severely letting down students. Some of his other positions include raising the minimum wage and developing a universal health care system.

According to a Gallup poll, the number of Americans identifying as independent rose from 39 to 42 percent between 2016 to 2017. As of 2014, according to the Pew Research Center, 14 percent of Vermonters claimed to have no political leanings towards Republicans or Democrats.

Neil Johnson, a resident of Waitsfield, and a candidate of the Green Mountain Party, has thrown his hat in the ring as well. The Green Mountain Party is essentially an independent party that attempts to focus on solutions not currently adopted by the major parties.

“On some issues certainly [we lean right], and on other issues we have people calling us a progressive party,” Johnson said.

For instance, Johnson has new ideas for affordable housing. He’s convinced that if zoning requirements are relaxed, truly affordable home-ownership is within reach.

Neil Johnson, of Waitsfield, is running for state House in the Washington-7 district.

“For a $600-per-month house you could move in today on minimum wage and own it,” he said. “And they talk a big game about wanting to help the poor, but I don’t see it actually coming to happen.”

He’s suspicious of current affordable housing programs, which, according to one real estate developer, can costs taxpayers upward of $500 per square foot.

“There’s some stuff that doesn’t look right — zero-interest loans and loans being relieved debt-free, and all this kind of stuff. There are some shenanigans going on,” Johnson said.

He’d also like to see Vermont’s education system shrink a few sizes.

“It’s totally union-controlled. The plans and all the ideas for the school funding are all union and lobbyist ideas. … That’s why nothing gets done.”

Johnson estimates that Vermont overspends on school administration by about two-fold.

Mason Wade, of Rochester, is another independent who is running for Senate, in Windsor County. He says the major parties are ruining Vermont.

Ballotpedia

Mason Wade, of Rochester, is an independent candidate for the Vermont Senate.

“Watching the [2016] election, I just knew that it was time for independents to be looked at, because the two-party system just hasn’t been working in my opinion,” Wade said. “I’m 63, and from my total experience as someone who has been paying attention since the Vietnam War, we just don’t need this two-party system in Vermont.”

He expressed frustration that Laramie was not included in the gubernatorial debates.

“As of today they are not letting the independent candidates into the theater,” he said. ” … Vermonters only get three debates for governor and they don’t get the information.”

When it comes to the big campaign issue, he’s all about making Vermont more affordable.

“I work with my hands, that’s how I make a living,” he said. “There are plenty of folks out there doing it, and they are trying to pay their taxes, and it’s tough.”

Wade said it’s time to downsize school governance.

“We’ve got a lot of problems, and most of it has to do with the supervisory unions,” he said. “There’s way too many, way too much money, and taxpayers’ heads are spinning.”

Another initiative Wade advocates for is to have credit unions get involved in promoting electric car ownership.

Beverly Stone

Beverly Stone, an independent candidate for state Senate to represent the Windham District.

Down in the Windham District, another independent candidate, Beverly Stone, of Brattleboro, is seeking a seat in the state Senate.

“Running as an independent candidate gives me the freedom to evaluate each issue on its own merit,” she told True North in an email. “The concerns we face today are too complex to be solved by a very divided two-party system. We need representatives who are free of party lines and financial ties/constraints, who are willing to listen to all sides.”

She added that the downside, however, is the lack of physical and financial support. Also, minor party candidates don’t get much attention from the media.

Regarding campaign issues, on health care Stone is in favor of an “open-market system” free of state borders.

“It will increase competition, thereby reducing rates,” she said. “Constraints on who can buy catastrophic or health savings policies need to be lifted, especially now that the state has voted for mandated health care.”

On education, she wants to see more physical activity and nature instruction, and less standardization.

“A standardized system is destructive to the freedom teachers need to nurture a love of learning in our children,” Stone said. “Our children benefit from integrated learning, daily physical movement, and non-academic opportunities to gain confidence. And, I agree with Chuck Laramie on the need to ban cell phones in school.”

Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North Reports. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.

Images courtesy of Chuck Laramie, Ballotpedia and Beverly Stone

6 thoughts on “Independent candidates look to introduce new solutions in Vermont

  1. Good luck Neil, you certainly have a message that resonates with many folks, I only wish we could of stayed in VT to see you win. We had to move on to greener pastures where the Jobs are and the lowers taxes and fees are. It was a hard decision but waiting for VT to get it’s head out of the sand wasn’t a risk we were willing to take.

    For instance, look at BLS Jobs data: At the low in 2009 VT had non farm wage and employment of ~295k and nearly 10 years later VT has ~313k. About 6% increase.

    https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/SMS50000000000000001?amp%253bdata_tool=XGtable&output_view=data&include_graphs=true

    Take NH at 620k to 690k. About double VT’s job growth at 11%.

    https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/SMS33000000000000001?amp%253bdata_tool=XGtable&output_view=data&include_graphs=true

    The only other state that’s about on par with VT in NE is CT. Guess what? Many of the same problems, high cost of living, government regulation that is out of control. Except CT has money, VT well…

    • I neglected to add, that then VT kicks you in the groin as you are finally leaving the state. Make sure you sell your house before you leave for a better job. We didn’t and got handed a 2.5% EXIT TAX on the price of the home that I built with my bare hands. Talk about adding salt to the wound.

    • Well in our area we have no Republicans running.

      The reason we have no Republicans running is everyone knows in this deep blues section of the state you can’t win. We are not competing against any Republican. We actually changed our candidacy from Lt. Governor to local house race so we would not be labeled a spoiler in the Lt. Governor’s race. It will be interesting to see how that race turns out,

      There are many areas in that state where there are no Republicans running, please explain how we’d negatively affect those areas.

  2. Thanks for covering our story, we haven’t been able to get any coverage in other papers & new sources despite many requests. You’d think they would at least want to tell us how bad we are, the young man who was 13 and will say very well spoken got all sorts for free press across the state and nation.

    Our Main Focus for Vermont is: Affordability, School Funding and our Drug Problem,

    the three white elephants our leaders continually ignore.

    We look to have Term Limits, Eliminate or Tax the PAC’s and Lobbyists, Bring our Ethics grade from one of the lowest in the nation to the highest (D- to A+, it’s our logo).

    Affordability has many facets, $95/wk day care, becoming a destination education state with associate professor pay double/tripled while reducing the cost for college class by 70%, affordable home ownership at $600 per month (interest rates are creeping up), good paying jobs, education in finance/business and family planning to stop generational poverty.

    Our drug problem is epic, we were leading the nation in addicted births. We have many people interested in possibly joining for 2020, everyone is curious to see how we do in our local race, which suddenly is filled with PAC, Lobbyist and well connected people funding the standard candidates.

    We really don’t want any money at this point, we just need for people to share our videos, website on Front Porch Forum or in emails. It’s local new sources like this the really investigate and inform the public to what is going on. The Waterbury record also did a fabulous story on all the local candidates without the programmed questions. Thanks again.

    Local debate on Mad River TV, also many interview on Today Lights Tomorrow.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev0-neGzoy8

    Interview with Professor Williams of Plan V-TV

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *