Lawmakers urge Vermont Board of Education to reverse school choice ruling

ANTI-CHOICE: Vermont Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe received a letter from 14 lawmakers urging the State Board of Education to correct a ruling that, they say, violates the language and intent of Act 46 regarding school choice.

ANTI-CHOICE: Vermont Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe received a letter from 14 lawmakers urging the State Board of Education to correct a ruling that, they say, violates the language and intent of Act 46 regarding school choice.

Bruce Parker Vermont Watchdog

A group of lawmakers in Vermont is urging the State Board of Education to correct a ruling that threatens school choice in the state’s 90-plus tuitioning towns.

State lawmakers on Thursday sent a letter to Education Secretary Rebecca Holcombe and State Board of Education Chair Stephen Morse, urging the board to reverse a ruling that prevents many districts from keeping school choice as they merge with other districts.

“We are writing regarding Act 46, and the confusion that has been created surrounding its implementation,” the letter states.

The letter’s 14 signatories — 11 representatives and three senators — claim the board’s decision, issued Sept. 15, violates the language and intent of Act 46. That decision said newly formed unified school districts can’t have school choice and public schools at the same grade levels.

In the letter, the authors cite a section of the law that says all merger transitions involving tuitioning districts must preserve the tuitioning option if a district so chooses:

Sec 4 (a) Tuition payment; protection. All governance transitions contemplated pursuant to this act shall preserve the ability of a district that, as of the effective date of this section, provides for the education of all resident students in one or more grades by paying tuition on the students’ behalf, to continue to provide education by paying tuition on behalf of all students in the grade or grades if it chooses to do so and shall not require the district to limit the options available to students if it ceases to exist as a discrete entity and realigns into a supervisory district or union school district.

By pointing to language in Act 46 that says districts decide whether school choice continues or goes away, the signatories hope to pressure the board to change its decision.

The board made its determination in September in response to supervisory unions whose member districts wanted school choice within a newly formed union. In the case of Franklin Northeast Supervisory Union — one of the cases that prompted the ruling — three of five member towns have school choice for grades 9-12, but two of the five towns operate public schools at the same grade levels.

The SBE said choice districts must surrender choice in such situations, arguing that since Vermont law prior to Act 46 didn’t allow choice and public schools to coexist at the same grade levels, the rule continues.

However, critics of the ruling say Act 46 changed the former rule and allows choice and public schools to coexist at the same grade levels. The ruling has consequences for choice towns across Vermont that must merge with other districts under statewide consolidation.

Over the past month, two attorneys, the House minority leader, the lieutenant governor, and others have denounced the board’s decision. In addition, two Democratic representatives from choice districts told Vermont Watchdog they want to clarify Act 46 to ensure the choice option stays for merging districts.

RELATED: Democrats prepared to defend school choice in Vermont

The dispute is of immediate interest to towns like Elmore and Morristown, which are voting on a proposed merger Tuesday. If both towns vote to form a new unified school district, and the SBE ruling stands, Elmore will lose school choice for grades 7-12.

The letter closes by asking Holcombe and Morse “to clarify that all communities that currently enjoy school choice may maintain that school choice regardless of their merger decisions.” The signatories seek a clarification by Nov. 13.

“I felt the need to say we’re not happy with it. A lot of the people who voted for Act 46 feel their intent is not being honored,” said state Rep. Job Tate, R-Mendon, who represents the choice towns of Mendon and Chittenden.

Tate, who took the lead in drafting the letter, said he wanted to reach Holcombe and Morse ahead of Election Day on behalf of constituents in choice towns who want to preserve school choice.

“People are confused. I can’t imagine the (confusion for) voters. Even legislators, we don’t know what’s going on, and these people are about to vote on a serious issue for their towns,” he said.

 Bruce ParkerBruce Parker is a reporter for Watchdog.org. Contact him at bparker@watchdog.org and follow him on Twitter @WatchdogVT

One thought on “Lawmakers urge Vermont Board of Education to reverse school choice ruling

  1. What’s to correct. If the State Board of Ed can’t read or understand English as it relates to Act 46, they should all be FIRED!!!!!!! It’s time someone holds these folks accountable.

Comments are closed.