MONTPELIER, Vt. — An amended bill passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past week could pressure public and independent schools to decrease detentions, expulsions and disproportionate discipline of minorities in favor of community- and student-led remediation.
With the latest proposal of amendment to H.675, schools could be pressured to avoid applying necessary consequences on troubled students. On or before July 1, 2019, the Agency of Education will issue guidance to all school boards and approved independent schools for implementing “restorative justice” policies that “decrease the use of exclusionary discipline,” the measure states.
If lawmakers approve a newly amended version of H.675, public and independent schools in Vermont may adopt a “restorative justice” approach to student discipline starting with the 2020-2021 school year.
The guidance will also say schools must not issue disciplinary measures in a way that “targets students based on race, ethnicity, gender, family income level, sexual orientation, immigration status or disability status.”
According to a December 2017 Whole-School Restorative Approach Resource Guide from the Agency of Education, the principles of restorative justice encourage schools to eliminate disciplinary measures such as detentions, suspensions, expulsions and referrals to the juvenile justice system, and instead steer troubled students into group communication circles and school-based student courts or judiciary boards.
The changes could leave troubled kids in schools and classrooms to continue to disrupt or threaten the safety of their peers.
Not everyone is thrilled about the policy direction. Twinfield Union School Board Chair Patrick Healy said it can be a useful program, but it’s not for everyone.
“I would say it’s a good tool to have in your toolbox, but not the end-all,” he said. “The legislation needs to slow down and lawmakers just kind of think about what they are doing to the school boards in all of their bills.”
Healy helps maintain the Green Mountain Cemetery in Montpelier and he’s worked with inmates for three decades on this effort. He said based on that experience, in addition to seeing some restorative justice practices selectively tried currently at Twinfield, the strategy needs more vetting before it’s applied everywhere.
“They just do [bills] so quick — all of the sudden it’s done,” he said. “Let’s have a trial period.”
True North Reports contacted several leaders from independent schools to gauge responses to the statewide program, since the legislation pertains to public and independent schools alike.
Mill Moore, director of the Independent Schools Association, seemed to think the bill language wouldn’t apply to students exhibiting grave misbehavior.
“Certainly violent behavior, endangering one’s self or others, would be an area where you have to consider that,” Moore told True North. “I don’t think restorative justice has much to do with dealing with violent behavior — safety is paramount.”
Moore said he’s checked with several of the schools concerning the amendment and no one seems too alarmed about the state encroaching on their disciplinary policies. “They all said they are using it now and they are very satisfied with the results,” he said.
Outside of the education sphere, “restorative justice” is a term that generally means persons who have committed crimes can — if they meet various criteria standards — opt to participate in a community panel or even go face-to-face with the victims to try to make amends. The practice in a school environment would adopt the same model, only using support groups comprised of school staff, students and parents.
Proponents argue the restorative approach relieves stress on an otherwise over-burdened criminal justice system. It may also enable perpetrators to avoid convictions on their record that could inhibit the ability to get a job or otherwise advance in society.
According to the amendment proposed by Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington, the Agency of Education will set restorative justice guidance for all schools to follow for all disciplinary matters. The agency also will establish a grant program to assist schools with the adoption and implementation of restorative justice principles for responding to school discipline problems.
According to Gloria Bruce, director of communications and marketing for the Lyndon Institute, an independent high school with about 600 students, the school is already applying restorative justice principals for boarding students and will apply them to other students next year.
“We will continue to both expand and enhance the program such that restorative justice practices are our primary approach when we consider how best to support students who are struggling with behavioral concerns,” she wrote in an email to True North.
Bruce added that for serious offenses, restorative justice may not be the best fit.
“That a school employs restorative justice practices does not mean that a student who has had a behavioral infraction does not incur a consequence,” she said. “However, it does mean that the consequence may not always be exclusionary in nature, as is often the case with detention and suspension.”
Brandon Mazur teaches interdisciplinary humanities for East Burke School, and he cast the restorative justice concept into historical context.
“Historically and anthropologically, for a majority of the time that humans have existed on the planet, this is the way that humans have solved their problems,” he said.
He explained that when humans lived in small hunter-gatherer units, the process of internal remediation was the standard, and it wasn’t until the advent of agricultural societies that larger groups required a code of laws.
Mazur’s comment echoes a statement from the Agency of Education Whole-School Restorative Approach Resource Guide: “The concepts, practices, and processes described in this publication are not new; they have been part of indigenous cultures the world over.”
But critics worry restorative justice lets kids off the hook and leaves teachers and fellow students vulnerable to continual disruption.
In a recent interview with the Brattleboro Reformer, Matthew Furnell, a restorative justice coordinator from the Greater Falls Community Justice Center, responded to critics of the disciplinary method.
“[Some worry that] you just kind of get on and you don’t have to do detention, you don’t have to be suspended, or you don’t have to go to jail, or pay a big fine,” he told the Reformer. “But actually standing up and facing your community is a really hard thing. Admitting accountability, saying I was wrong — I did something wrong — and then taking the steps to repair that harm can be a difficult thing, but once it’s done, it can be a very rewarding thing.”
The Agency of Education guide suggests that restorative justice disciplinary measures should be optional for all involved.
“Restorative practices, when fully aligned, are voluntary. People choose to participate in restorative practices and people choose how they participate in them, so as long as their choices do not infringe on someone else’s safety or ability to participate. A person may choose to listen and not speak in a restorative process or practice,” the guide states.
Senate lawmakers on Wednesday referred H.675 to the Committee on Appropriations.
Michael Bielawski is a reporter for True North Reports. Send him news tips at bielawski82@yahoo.com and follow him on Twitter @TrueNorthMikeB.
“Restorative Justice”. After a burglary, the little puke was caught and I went through the process of ‘restorative justice’. An exercise in futility. NOTHING happened to the criminal. Nothing. So much for ‘restorative justice’.
“Overburdened justice system”?? Aren’t they the ones that let a child abuser walk last year, and now he’s killed a woman?
How much of a “burden” could they be under? They can’t release violent criminals fast enough?
Justice is a shambles in Vermont. This proposal only adds to the failure. Tell us again how Vermont should be more like Florida, California and New York so we can be “safe like them”.
When I was in elementary school in Spfld, my sixth grade teacher was also the Principal, Eric Bibbens. He was very straight forward and nice. He also had a “black ruler”. If a kid got out of line, he would take the kid to a room and dish out a couple of wacks. There was not more trouble. Never had disciplinary problems. Also when the kid got home, the parents would also discipline, a double whammy. That was control, the honest way. This was in the 50’s.
The 50’s was the best time to live and experience. None of this dumb foolish Montpelier Liberal crap. The “ME” generation is now in control.
Tom, I totally agree. When I was ‘growing up’ (please don’t tell anyone I used that ‘unfeeling’ term), the worst punishment I could receive was for my parents to find out what I’d done bad. The schools would enact their punishment, but I felt lucky if they didn’t tell my mom. That’s when the real lesson began. For some strange reason, I grew up, worked for my ME degree and my MS while working. I guess if they’d yelled at the school for being ‘uncaring’, I’d be much better off than I am today.
Ohhhh please make it STOP. It’s just one stupid idea after another coming from Montpelier. Why do we need to legislate a policy related to discipline? If a situation warrants something different…just do it. These politicians must be absolutely baked. Just sitting around in the cafeteria eating brownies and coming up with foolishness. “Hey..how about this? We should institute a bicycle registration scheme.” Followed by lots of giggling and hearty agreement.
“He explained that when humans lived in small hunter-gatherer units, the process of internal remediation was the standard, and it wasn’t until the advent of agricultural societies that larger groups required a code of laws.” ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! I believe the rule of law was a major advancement. Perhaps they are just hoping to prepare us for when their restrictive/expensive energy policies knock us all back into the Stone Age. And D. DeCoteau is spot on ! This is the same social engineering that resulted in school and local authorities in Florida ignoring criminal activity in order to win the “prize” of government $$.
They should be applying the rule with bad behavior come consequences no matter who you are.
Exactly. Sounds so simple. But no! Montpelier has to mess with it.
This just reaffirms my belief that many in the Statehouse today must be voted out of office.
Remember in November.
First the Montpelier Morons attack the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Vermonters. Now they are trying to create the same school environment RESPONSIBLE for the mass murder in South Florida. Unbelievable!
If the disrupters are given a pass because of race, I would suggest that is in of itself a form of racial discriminisation. When will this silliness, feel good stuff ever end?.
Just Give Us a Little Equal Justice !
How about punishing disruptive students without regard for the race, creed or color ! If the misbehave, they get punished – if they happen to be disproportionately of one group or another, so be it, they are being punished for being a member of the group of misbehaving students – NOT because they are also a member of a social or racial group !
Equal Justice is administering rewards and punishment based upon the act committed – blind to the race, creed, color, religious affiliation or geographic origin !
Restorative Justice is just a catch phrase to excuse anti-social behavior !
Agreed.
Restorative Justice is just a ‘cute’ liberal term for avoiding responsibility and letting our kids do what they want with no self-discipline or consequences. It also adds to the drug problem in this country and the rising crime rates in poorer neighborhoods and growing fear of one’s neighbors many times. Why is this idiocy used? It fits the liberal agenda, which is basically to keep the population dumb and needy and scared. Then Big Brother ( liberal socialists like Stalin and Fascists like Hitler and their modern like) can come to the rescue and “save” America from itself and in the process take the ultimate power for themselves.
Ahh – “Restorative Justice” – Doesn’t that sound special! Just another socialist scheme brought to the green hills of Vermont by the likes of Charles Johnson and the rest of his leftist friends. Have you looked at the test scores of Vermont students lately? Truly appalling!!!
More social engineering from the golden dome. This looks similar to the PROMISE program implemented in Southern Florida that led to the shooting tragedy and death of 17 people. The Parkland school shooter who’s behavior record never made it into the firearms background check system allowed him to purchase a firearm because his dangerous behavior was ignored and he was never arrested. PROMISE stands for, ‘Preventing Recidivism through Opportunities, Mentoring, Intervention, Support, and Education.’ Leave it to the progressives to bring that nonsense here. Haven’t we had enough of these social engineers?
.
More on Promise.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/03/05/ingraham_promise_program_hailed_by_obama_admin_led_to_florida_schools_ignoring_violent_students.html#!
No doubt, When a bully beats up a kid every day in class, you should ask him kindly to please stop and if he doesn’t, you will ask him (kindly of course) to go to his safe space with his coloring book. During math class would be good idea. After all, he “don need no stinkin math”
It worked in Parkland FL didn’t it? Didn’t it?????
The guidance will also say schools must ” not ” issue disciplinary measures in a way that
“targets students based on race, ethnicity, gender, family income level, sexual orientation,
immigration status or disability status.”…….Is this a real problem with the above mentioned
or just another made up issue ” Targets” ??
What a crock , if you need to apply any disciplinary action then so be it. This is just another
way of giving a kid that’s disobedient free reign. They will use and say anything for there
cause and these liberal fools are just making matters worst with this type of legislation .
Perhaps the schools should start issuing little colored triangles for students so everybody would know their ‘preferred’ gender, ethnicity, family income, disability status, etc.
We could call them CCB’s – concentration camp badges.