Sanders proposing a monopoly over the health finance and delivery systems

By Casey Ryan | The Daily Signal

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., introduced single-payer health care legislation Sept. 13 that would give Americans health insurance through Medicare, but the bill would effectively set up a government monopoly.

Specifically, he proposed financial options for Medicare for All that he said would save families and businesses when it comes to expenses. A couple of the options are for employers to pay a 7.5 percent income-based premium and for households to pay a 4 percent income-based premium.

Under Medicare for All, employers could face a 7.5 percent payroll tax. Sanders is also floating a 4.5 percent premium paid by households and a progressive income-tax on the nation’s wealthiest earners to fund the program.

Sanders also proposed a marginal income tax rate of 40 percent for $250,000 to $500,000; 45 percent for $500,000 to $2 million; 50 percent for $2 million to $10 million; and 52 percent for incomes over $10 million.

Robert Moffit, a senior fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health Policy Studies, said Sanders is proposing a monopoly over the health finance and delivery systems, and this means “there will no longer be any private health insurance.” He said people will not be able to keep their current health insurance plans.

“In order to accomplish this objective, Congress is going to have to impose very heavy taxes,” Moffit said.

Moffit said he doesn’t think a single-payer system will ever be successful unless it either allocates a budget for health care or imposes a price control system. He said the problem is that if demand exceeds the budget, choices will have to be made, such as deciding the people who will receive health care and how they will get it.

Because Sanders’ bill would be a government program, Moffit said it will also go through congressional deal-makings and interventions.

“You’re talking about a massive politicization of the system where almost every health care decision becomes a political decision,” Moffit said.

The Medicare for All Act of 2017 has been controversial among Republican members of Congress. Phil Novack, press secretary of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Cruz was “strongly opposed to a single-payer system that would put government in control of our health care.”

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said Americans will receive “inferior health care” if it is in the hands of the government.

“What we find is that when we hand other things over to the federal government, it very often makes a mess of them,” Lee said.

There were also 15 Democratic senators who introduced the legislation with Sanders, including Sens. Al Franken, D-Minn.; Kamala Harris, D-Calif.; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

“If we’re dealing with it in the emergency room, it’s too little, too late and it’s too expensive,” Harris said in a press release. “Let’s give the taxpayers of the United States a better return on their investment, which means Medicare for All.”

Moffit said the Democratic Party he grew up with had moderates and even conservatives, but this bill is a “really sharp turn to the left” in public policy.

3 thoughts on “Sanders proposing a monopoly over the health finance and delivery systems

  1. All this time Uncle Bernie was running against Hillary and Trump he said he was running for President. Now we find out this time he’s really running for Commissar.

    You won’t need doctors, you will need lawyers and Uncle Bernie will supply you with State Lawyers at no charge when you get hauled into court.

    “Comrade, what were you doing at the dispensary when you should have been working?”

    “I was injured Commissioner.”

    “Nonsense Comrade. The State will tell you when you are injured.” “You need to be reeducated in a camp of strict regime.” “You won’t be goldbricking with a broken arm there.”

    Welcome to Uncle Bernie’s ‘Radiant Future’.

  2. Will all this nonsense create a shortage of doctors? I think so. Look at the expense doctors have to go through to become a doctor. It will also probably create another bureaucracy that we don’t need. It will be like jumping into the abyss.

Comments are closed.