The green agenda burns to ashes in Paris

By Jarrett Stepman | The Daily Signal

A riot is an ugly thing.

The anarchical mayhem in the streets of Paris in recent days paint a picture of a fractured society with deep-seated problems—a breakdown of the fragile yet essential rule of law.

While we’ve come to expect such things in France, there are specific reasons why these protests have erupted in the last month.

The “climate” agenda, peddled as a means to save the planet and reduce inequality, is being exposed in France as an agenda inherently at odds with the interests of middle- and working-class people.

Last year, a wide range of American and international media, celebrities, and activists excoriated President Donald Trump for pulling the United States out of the international Paris climate agreement. Trump said in 2017 that he would put “no other consideration before the well-being of American citizens” and that he would reject an agreement that would force taxpayers to “absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.”

Former Vice President and climate change activist Al Gore said at the time that leaving the deal was a “reckless and indefensible action.”

But Americans may in fact have a better grasp of their interests than a tiny elite across the pond and in America’s powerful media institutions. For proof, look to the streets of Paris.

Paris is now burning, and French President Emmanuel Macron, who was once widely praised as a kind of “centrist” savior of the global community, is in hot political waters.

Macron’s approval ratings sit at 23 percent in a recent poll, according to Reuters, a new low for his presidency. The “yellow vest” protesters, as they’ve been called, have forced his administration to back off its proposed new gas and utility taxes.

The protesters appear to come from a vast swath of French society and don’t fit neatly on the ideological spectrum. They’ve rebelled against high taxes while also calling for increases in the minimum wage.

Alas, the consequences of living in a society where the government is involved in every aspect of a person’s life.

“France’s violent Yellow Vest protests are now about many domestic concerns, but it’s no accident that the trigger was a fuel-tax hike,” read an editorial for The Wall Street Journal. “Nothing reveals the disconnect between ordinary voters and an aloof political class more than carbon taxation.”

France’s widespread use of nuclear power has allowed it to move a bit further away from the carbon economy in terms of energy costs, but its transportation sector is still highly reliant on oil, The Wall Street Journal noted.

Nicolas Loris, an economist and regulatory expert at The Heritage Foundation, highlighted the widespread economic harm that’s caused by “green” policies:

Global warming regulations for new and existing power plants will drive electricity bills higher for families and businesses. Fuel efficiency mandates for cars, trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles increase the up-front cost of vehicles by thousands of dollars. Methane regulations on oil and gas would introduce burdensome, complex processes that would likely slow the industry’s current efforts to reduce emissions, which have been falling for decades.

For the average person, the cost of the war on climate change can be severe.

In a country like France, which is already dealing with economic hardship, low growth, and high joblessness rates, you have a recipe for disaster.

Maybe there is something to be said about leaders asserting national self-interest after all.

The shocking images of riots are nevertheless emblematic of the collapse of the green agenda and the animosity it engenders from the people it harms: the forgotten men—squeezed by regulations and taxes—who don’t count themselves among the privileged few who receive generous green energy subsidies.

In France, many see this dysfunctional system as inevitable and unchangeable without extreme recourse.

Certainly, we should deplore the mobs and destruction of property. In America, we’d hope that our differences can be solved through elections, deliberation, and peaceful protest, if necessary.

This is certainly possible as long as we maintain our constitutional system and a cultural respect for the rule of law that the Founding Fathers and generations of Americans blessed us with.

While France’s economy is stagnant, the U.S. economy has been booming—in part due to the flourishing oil industry and the curtailment of regulations that were a hallmark of the Obama era.

Are the conditions in Europe really what we want to replicate in the U.S.?

California is going down this path, and perhaps the new Congress will as well. But the chaos in France should serve as a stern warning of what lies down the road.

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Korkut Tas

4 thoughts on “The green agenda burns to ashes in Paris

  1. Just like in Paris, some Vermont RE programs also should burn to ashes.
    Trump was right to leave Paris COP21.
    It was a bad deal for US workers and a bad deal for French workers, as demonstrated by the strikes.
    The French government has been bleeding the people for its agendas, just like the Vermont government has been bleeding Vermonters for its agendas.

    Vermont Heat Pump Program a Failure Due a lack of Energy Savings

    After numerous complaints about a lack of energy savings, the Vermont Department of Public Service surveyed 77 existing heat pump installations at 65 locations and found the average energy savings were $200/heat pump/y, which had an installed cost of $5000/heat pump, and might last up to 15 years. Amortizing the $5000 at 5% requires monthly payments totaling $474/y, i.e., heat pumps used in typical Vermont houses are a money looser, and would be even more of a money looser if annual maintenance contracts were added.

    The main problem is the typical Vermont house is an energy hog and has a high peak heating demand during colder winter days, which makes it unsuitable for heat pumps.

    Heat pumps used in such typical houses would displace only 32% of the Btus, which would not provide adequate $savings.

    Heat pumps used in highly insulated and sealed houses would displace 100% of the Btus, which would provide adequate $savings.
    http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/vermont-baseless-claims-about-cold-climate-heat-pumps-for

  2. Like it or not you folks in VT are going to get one. the left DemoPorgs are going to ram it down your throat, and then ask you to enjoy it. It’s what they do. They want to control every aspect of your lives. Control what you east via taxation (Sugar Tax) —- Yet taxes many good for you drinks. V8 Splash Light is taxed. But not the holly grail in VT. Maple Syrup.

  3. Paris is finally waking up to the Doom & Gloom liberal agenda ( tax, tax, tax )

    As stated, last year a wide range of American and international media, celebrities, and activists excoriated President Donald Trump for pulling the US out of the international Paris climate agreement……….

    Along with all this hoopla, you then have Former Vice President and Climate Change Activist &
    Guru Al Gore said at the time that leaving the deal was a “reckless and indefensible action.”.

    Hey Al hows your Jet running, as you travel the globe spewing you Climate Change Disaster or the
    Polar Ice Cap will be gone by 2009 ?? ,

    Yup another Liberal….with the sky is falling, the sky is falling rhetoric !!

  4. “They’ve rebelled against high taxes while also calling for increases in the minimum wage” – The two demands are consistent. Lowering taxes, reducing energy costs leaves more money in the private sector which accelerates cash flow, increases product demand hence demand for workers from resource extraction down to retail sales resulting in a tighter labor market which pushes wages upward. Lower energy costs and increased product demand encourages competition. That and economy of scale reduces costs and even results in more competitive export market pricing. Lower taxes/regulations encourage entrepreneurial activity, new businesses. A perceived improvement in the standard of living accelerates the economy; extracting cash from the private sector slows it down. Increasing wages by deregulation rather than by more regulation works best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *